Over 25 Million Voters – Mostly Invisible!

Even before the 1st round of the so-called Egyptian Presidential Elections, many (myself included) had called for a boycott, many others called for invalidating ballots. However, because many voters, including most revolutionaries found at least one candidate they believed in, many did in fact go and vote. Hamdeen had genuine fans, as did Aboul Fotouh, etc.

This reality changed dramatically with the 2nd round of elections as many people, disillusioned with the results of the 1st round quickly joined the ranks of those calling for a boycott, many simply didn’t like the results, which left them forced to choose between handing Egypt over to the Muslim Brotherhood, or effectively betraying the revolution entirely and surrendering the country back to the old regime, represented by Ahmed Shafiq.

So the call for the boycott grew, not only that, but many citizens, despite not formally calling themselves boycotters, actually did abandon the process, becoming de-facto boycotters simply because they had lost all hope in the so-called ‘democratic’ process. They decided that the game was now between the old regime and the Muslim Brotherhood, and they simply were no longer interested in taking part.

This became clear when the first day of the run-off elections came upon us and the polling stations were seen to be much emptier than they had been in the previous round.

It should be noted that even in the first round of the presidential elections, the turnout figures had been dramatically reduced in relation to the turnout at the parliamentary elections a few months ago. The numbers had already dropped from 62% down to around 46% – indicating a 16% effective boycott, or around 7 million Egyptians – all of whom had previously participated, but no longer wanted to be involved.

Now – in the afternoon of the 1st day of the run-off, the Lawyers Syndicate estimated the turnout to be less than 15% –

Journalists & Bloggers who took pictures of polling stations also indicate a very low turnout –

Reports were coming in from people in Suez, that the turnout there did not exceed 4% – FOUR percent, and that to their surprise, soldiers from the third army division in Suez were actually knocking on people’s homes, asking them to go vote. The turnout was that low.

A lawyer stationed in a polling station in Gharbeya, said that of 5,000 registered voters in his polling station, only 200 had shown up. That, again, is around 4%.

In fact, the turnout was so low that people were discussing whether or not it was because of the weather, citing the heat as being a possible reason for the low turnout, as though Egypt did not function normally under such temperatures, as though hot summers were not the norm in Egypt.

A worker who came to do some work at my apartment, and who had gone to invalidate his vote on the second day of the run-off elections told me that, while leafing through the registration book to sign his name, all the preceding pages were mostly empty. He said he saw one or two signatures every 3 or 4 pages, and that on his page, where he signed, his was literally the only signature on the page.

The turnout was so low – that the Shorouq Newspaper had a huge headline proclaiming (after the 1st day of the run-off elections) that the ‘Boycott had won’ –

Despite all this, we are now being told that over 25 million Egyptian went out to vote!

If you look at TV footage from ONTV – where they had a split-screen showing polling stations from across Egypt – this is what you see –

Look at it carefully,  the Suez station is empty, as are the ones in Sharqeya, Alexandria, North Sinai, Port Said, and Ismaileya. At most you see one or two voters.

Now it’s not as though we had an overabundance of polling stations. There were, apparently, around 13,000 polling stations. If you consider that eligible voters were estimated to be around 51 million (magically up from around 41 million during the parliamentary elections held only a few months ago) – then that’s around 4000 voters per polling station. So if 51% went, then we’re talking around 2000 voters per station on average. Which means they must’ve had 166 votes per hour – over two days – that’s about 83 voters per hour. Which means that they must’ve all looked pretty full most of the time. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Sadly, neither one of the leading candidates wants to contest the actual turnout figures, since they each want to claim as many voted in their favor as possible. The only loser in this falsification is Egypt, and the will of its’ people. This was an effective boycott, and they are lying about the turnout figures.

Related Posts

← Previous post

Next post →

3 Comments

  1. In Parliament elections there were 27000 monitors. Presidential elections only 9000, that is because of NGO crackdown by SCAF.

    Listen Mr. Robert Becker he was the only foreign NGO worker who refused to flee with others abroad US plane, fired because of that from National Democratic Institute NGO:

    http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/9946?in=10:47&out=12:26

    It’s worthwhile to listen in full, man seems to be aware of situation in Egypt. NDI gave advice to total of 22 political parties in Egypt

  2. Well. According to official sources, voter turnout in the second round was around 50% (25+ million). If that’s the case, with 13,100 polling stations, you must have had the average of 2000 voters at every station. Given that around 24 hours (12 hours at least on each day) were given to voters over the two days, it would be 83 voters in the hour, which is more than enough.

    Actually bunch of tweets are not enough to say that the overall turnout was low. I went to Sayeda Aisha, Darb El-Ahmar and Giza on the first day to cover the elections, and the turnout was high out there, even in the morning, and I didn’t tweet about it though was high.

    So if you have many tweets saying turnout was low, it’s probable that some tweeted about the stations that had low turnout only and didn’t about another stations with high turnouts, or it could be just the stations they passed by. Also low turnout in the morning/evening in some places were because of the weather/heat, followed by a high turnout in the evening/night. Also many rested on the first day and voted on the day after, etc.

    Press Syndicate estimated turnout to be 15% (which is not accurate) on the first day. So it’s possible that rest of voters (50% – 15%) voted on the second day (35%). If the syndicate’s estimation was wrong, it might be 20% first day and 30% second day, for instance.

  3. There are usually far less people on the 2nd day than on the first. Even if we assume the MB mobilized on the 2nd day in order not to have the ballots spend the night unsupervised. But in both cases, I want to see the 25 million signatures!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!